01743nas a2200181   4500000000100000008004100001260001600042100001900058700001700077700002000094700002600114245012000140856004800260300001600308490000700324520121600331020001401547       2009                            d  c2009/07/01/1 aAlexander Kerr1 aAndrew Baird1 aRavinder Bhalla1 aSrinivas Vaidyanathan00aReply to ‘Using remote sensing to assess the protective role of coastal woody vegetation against tsunami waves’  uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160903046711  a3817-3820, 0 v303 aIn a recent paper in the International Journal of Remote Sensing, Olwig et al. [28 (2007) 3153?3169] present a comprehensive, geographic information system (GIS)?based description of the spatial distribution of damage from the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami relative to coastal vegetation in Tamil Nadu, India, and conclude that ??mangrove forests and coastal shelterbelts provided protection from the [t]sunami.? In this comment, we demonstrate that the complex spatial pattern of damage makes their observational approach unable to substantiate this claim. Contrary to the authors' assertions, other factors known to affect tsunami inundation, such as elevation, near?shore bathymetry and patterns of land use, are shown to vary across their study site so as to create the appearance of a mitigating effect by vegetation on inundation and damage. We show that without explicitly quantifying and controlling for these confounding factors, it cannot be ascertained, even in principle, whether vegetation did ameliorate tsunami damage. We conclude with a call for analyses that can simultaneously assess the role of the discernibly manifold factors generating the pattern of inundation and damage of the 2004 tsunami.  a0143-1161